INTRODUCCION A LA HISTORIA CONTEMPORANEA by GEOFFREY BARRACLOUGH and a great selection of similar Used, New and Collectible Books. Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (English, Spanish, Paperback) / Author : Geoffrey Barraclough ; ; History, Books. : Introduccion a la Historia Contemporanea (Spanish Edition) ( ) by Geoffrey Barraclough and a great selection of similar New.
|Published (Last):||14 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||17.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.29 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Refresh and try again. Written inthe book feels slightly ahead of its time in emphasizing repeatedly that the future of “contemporary history” will not lie in Europe, but in the regions of the world that are home to the vast majority of the world’s population: It is one of these books now 50 years old or sowhere one while reading it entertains the fantasy or hope geoffery the author would have been alive today so as to write a more contemporary continuation to it.
Indeed it is because non- Europeans have accepted European values that they hisroria Western rule. Their enthusiasm became a trifle excessive, however, or at least premature, when on page they promoted him to Prime Minister.
Many were skeptical of systems building, but almost everyone abandoned positivist suspicions of theorization and generalization. If existing histories did not provide an understanding of reality what was the good of reading them?
An Introduction to Contemporary History by Geoffrey Barraclough (1 star ratings)
If history could not prepare one for what was happening in the present what was the point of studying the past at all? Of the mapr changes that occurred in the transitional era perhaps the greatest was the “revolt introducion the west,” in the light of which western E u q e a n world dominance might now be seen as a passing phenomenon. As the Russians moved towards the Western posi- tion on disarmament, the Western negotiators backed away.
Emil Shatov rated it really liked it Aug 19, There was never any reason why it should. Barradough’sappointment tothestevenson Chair was amajcxtuming point in his canxr. The title- History, Morals, and Politics-was indeed forbidding, and the issue of moral judgment in historiography which he wrestled with that day at Chatham Barracoough was a difficult one.
They would see, in looking back, a mnflict be- tween two conceptions of right, not between right and wmng much like those historians today who examine the thirteenth-century conflict between the contemporajea William Tell barraclouhh the house of Habsburg.
In doing so, he also rejected established historicist assumptions and p d m in favor of the of natural sdence.
Be the first to ask a question about Georfrey Introduction to Contemporary History. For biographical data, se ContemptmDy Authors Europeans, he believed, required a conception of their own past that better acknowledged the influence ckntemporanea extra-European forces, and a new aw- of the wider world as such, in which they w m destined to play a muchdiminished de.
This conception of history, with its renewed sense of certainty, restored Barraclough’s confidence in his discipline. Stravinsky, for example, bafraclough after from his early “dynamism” to neo-classicism. Soviet interest in d6tente may revive, but it will probably be many years before the Chinese feel the time is ripe for serious negotiations; they will hardly welcome a settle- ment until their great power potential has been both achieved and recognized.
Survey of International Affairs 1955-1956by Geoffrey Barraclough; Rachel F. Wall
This rejection of moral judgment interlocked with Barrachugh’s rejection of historicism. It is densely factual, original, clearheaded and profound beyond its remit.
Stead, with his vision of the “Americanization of the world,” Americans such as Brooks Adams, even Kipling in the sombre “Recessional” he wrote for Queen Victoria’s jubilee inare only a few of the more outstanding figures among a geoffery who sensed the unsettling impact of new forces: Was it also as the authors believe, a period of missed opportunity?
Young reccmunended that when historians study men they should ask, ”What was happening in the world when he was twenty? Space, Bradley asserted, was only “a relation between terms which can never be introduccioon.
The truth value of histories depended in part historria whether they “made sense” to their readers. The spedfic content of this thesis, and its validity, are of less i n m t here, however, than the way in which it was argued. A short, powerful book. Both contributed, with increasing force as time passed, to the decline of the certitutdes which had sustained the commonly accepted picture of man and the universe.
PLANES DE ESTUDIO
The ultimate refinement – some would say the reductio ad geoffgey – was the surrealistic word sequences of James Histogia, Gertrude Stein, and E. Filter your search Filter by categories. Knaurs Neuer Historischer Weltatlas. London, New York, Toronto: Indeed, something of the critical disposition evident in his later work is apparent already in this effort to plt English medieval study out of its insularity.
During the second World War he m e d in political intdigencx, in the air force, and in the Air Ministry, while also preparing The Origins o f Modprn Germany, which was published in Here only the impact of nistoria in the period after was strong enough to override conservative resistance and carry the change through. Mary rated it it was ok Jan 26, He concerned himself with preoonditions rather than causes, types rather than particulars, and structures rather than individuals.
Studies mom m w l y defined in time and 17 bid. In the authors’ judgment, the Bandung conference, which signalled the emergence of a third world force, may have been the most significant event of the period under review.
His call for universalism was a way of urging historians to generalize, interpret, and derive meaning frmn their study of the past. Instead, Barraclough highlights the intellectual divison between the defenders of the humanist tradition of the aristocratic and bourgeois rule, and the attackers of this tradition: The type of democracy prevalent today in western Europe – what we summarily call “mass democracy” – is a new type of democracy, created for the most part in the last sixty or seventy years and different in essential points from the liberal democracy of the nineteenth century.